About Nola Wilken

Cycling enthusiast and owner of Restoring Vintage Bicycles; CPA/Founder of Wilken & Company, P.C., CPAs

Honey, I Built an E-Bike: the Swytch E-Bike Conversion Kit

My introduction to e-bikes has been a mixed bag.  The first e-bike I rode was Portland’s own Biketown model – a giant clunky bike meant to be shared and abused by the masses.  While the e-bike version of this bike was a vast improvement over the analog version, it is an unwieldy beast with a rough ride on rough pavement.  Later, I purchased a Brompton e-bike (C line electric model), and have had mixed feelings about that riding experience.  Earlier this year I bought a used e-bike from an acquaintance and the bike motor failed on my second outing.

So, it was with some trepidation that I decided to order the Swytch ebike conversion kit – a “universal” front hub motor kit marketed as lightweight and easy to install – with the added benefit that if I didn’t like the system, my chosen bike could be simply restored back to its previous (and glorious) human powered version.

The Swytch Technology Company is based in the U.K. and is relatively new on the e-bike scene.  It uses a “customer funded” purchase order model, and appears to carry little if no inventory on hand.  From a purely machiavellian perspective, this is a great business model if you can pull it off.  From a customer service standpoint, it leaves much to be desired.  But with demand exceeding supply, this is a business model that appears to be working for them, for now.

It’s important to know key details about what you want to order before placing your order:  wheel size in ISO, rim drilling (Presta vs. Schrader), front dropout width (must be 10mm), desired battery range (10 miles for the Air and 20 miles for the MAX versions), whether you want brake/motor cut-off, whether you want a throttle, what kind of display you want.  The process for ordering is strange:  first you get yourself in line for a “batch” by paying a down payment consisting of the price of the basic kit.  Later, you are “invited” to complete the order with all of the details noted above and paying any extra cost for ad-ons.  Orders are shipped on a schedule, which appears to currently be about two months out.

I scoured on-line forums and customer reviews before taking the plunge and based on what I had read, was prepared for the worst:  orders with missing parts, orders with extra parts, orders with the wrong parts, orders that never arrived.  But I did place my order back in October and received the kit two months later, as expected.

When the kit arrived I was pleased to see that it was well packed, and with almost no plastic, meaning that I could recycle about 99% of the packaging.  All the boxes were labeled, making it easy to unpack and check off the items in the box, carefully comparing them to my order.  There were only two minor mishaps:  I had ordered an extra battery charger with a U.S. power cord, but it was shipped with a U.K. power cord.  And, I ordered my rim drilled for Presta, but received a rim drilled for Schrader valves.  Both problems were easily solved:  the charger power cord port is the same as my Brompton’s so I can easily swap them, and I often use Presta valves in Schrader rims.  My process for doing so involves cutting out a small collar from cloth rim tape to fit over the valve stem.  This provides extra protection from the tube attempting to herniate into the larger Schrader hole and also guards against the valve hole cutting into the base of the valve stem.  You can do the same thing with a small piece of extra tubing.

I had decided to order a 26 inch/559 wheel for my kit since I have 3 bikes with that wheel size.  The 1980’s Bridgestone MB3 was my chosen bike for the installation. I followed the steps in the instruction manual carefully, and read it through a few times and also looked at a few videos before starting the process.  Since the kit is advertised as being easy to install with no special tools, I did not take it to my shop but instead assembled it in my office, turning the bike upside down to begin, and using the small set of tools that I keep on hand there.

The first step is to remove the existing front wheel and swap out the tire and tube from that wheel to the Swytch motor hub wheel – a 36 hole rim with machined sidewalls laced in a 2 cross pattern.  I weighed the Swytch wheel before installation and compared that to the weight of my existing wheel (sans tire and tube) – the weight difference was 4lbs. 3 oz.  I also weighed my MAX battery (2lbs 9 oz) as well as the other components and came up with a total added weight of 8 lbs 8 oz – higher than the advertised claim of 5-6 lbs. but still reasonable.  Obviously, weight will vary based on wheel size and battery size as well as any extra accessories.  The wheel appears well built and spins perfectly true.

The front wheel installation went fine once I finally got my Kojak tire off of my existing rim.  After much frustration trying to get the bead off, I finally resorted to using my metal tire levers which are both narrower and stronger than my plastic ones but also run the risk of puncturing the tube.  Fortunately, the Kojak tire mounted easily to the new rim.  Once the anti rotation washers were secured in the proper position and with the motor cable pointed downwards (toward the ground when the bike is upright), I secured the axle nuts and pushed on the covers.

The next step is to install the magnetic disk and pedal sensor.  This kit does not include a torque sensor, and so is activated and controlled only by the rotation of the magnetic disk attached to the left side crank arm as it passes over the pedal sensor, mounted to the frame.  I found the instructions for this part of the process somewhat confusing and ended up dismantling my first attempt and starting over.  The magnetic disk needs to face in the correct direction (noted on the disk) toward the frame.  The inner connecting pieces are meant to grab onto the axle and center the disk so that it stays in the same position while rotating.  There are two hinges on the crank arm attachment that allow you to adjust the plane of the disk so that it is parallel to the frame, and once done should be tightened down with a 3mm allen key.  But, I learned that it’s best to zip tie it to the crank arm first, and then adjust the angle, and then tighten the hinge bolts.  Next up is the pedal sensor which when correctly positioned needs to be 3mm away from the magnetic disk. The sensor has an adhesive backing plus additional adhesive spacers (of which all were used for this installation).  I used the 3mm allen key to perfect the distance from the sensor to the magnetic ring, then zip tied it down using the supplied ties, after tightening down the angle bolt and nut.  I did not have any clearance problems because this is an 80’s mountain bike with a long bottom bracket spindle and plenty of frame clearance.  Modern “road” bikes may have significantly less clearance and thus require more problem solving for this step.

Off center clamp
Cables – a bit messy even after clean up.

Next up was installing the battery clamp (which houses the controller), installing the base display, and then hooking up all the cables, which are all color coded.  The battery clamp/controller comes with 3 different sized shims to accommodate different bar sizes.  I ended up needing to position the clamp off-center because the clamps fell directly on that spot that is between the stem clamp and the bar.  So, I used one set of shims for the bar portion and one set for the stem clam portion.  It all worked out fine and the clamp feels very secure.  I jammed my cables behind the clamp to get everything to fit. I took a little more time to adjust my zip ties and clean up the cable routing.

Now it was time to set up the base display.  You need to enter your wheel size and maximum desired speed (15 mph for the UK or 20 mph for the US), as well as the initial power level.  That’s when I discovered that the display shipped was not the same display as pictured in the manual.  It is smaller and operates differently.  So, I needed to download the pdf for that component, which I quickly found on the Swytch website.  After some fiddling I managed to get my wheel size set and to select my maximum speed (20) as well as the initial power level.  Then I lifted up the front wheel, turned the crank, and behold, I had power to the front wheel.  Whew!

On the first test ride, I noted that it takes several rotations of the crank before the power kicks in.  Likewise, it takes several seconds for the power to turn off once you stop pedaling.  Since the bike is slow off the mark, this means that you need to shift down before stopping at intersections, a bit of a feat with a derailleur geared bike because while you are slowing down for a stop you also need to pedal to shift down which means the motor is propelling you forward and your brakes need to be strong enough to bring you to a halt while the motor is moving the wheel forward.  I had not purchased the add-on brake/motor interrupter but in retrospect believe this could be a good idea if you are installing it on a derailleur geared bike.  Probably, I will learn to adapt to this by downshifting a little earlier. Internally geared hubs would be ideal for this system because you can shift without pedalling.

There are 5 power levels for this little 250 watt motor, which I think is overkill.  3 levels would probably be fine.  I started out on level 4 and it was way too much power for riding on flats.  I quickly overcame my maximum cadence in my top gear (45/12=92) at 20 mph, so I backed it down to level 2 and found that to be about right for general riding.  The power delivery feels smooth and the motor is nearly silent.  The motor has been proclaimed “free of drag” but I did find the drag noticeable when coasting and when pedalling with no power.  Not daunting, but noticeable.

On my first test ride I rode from my office to the top of Mt. Tabor (8 mile round trip).  What a blast!  But, I discovered it is really necessary to shift down while climbing as well as to increase the power level on steep hills.  Even so, it was really fun to cruise up to the top without feeling fatigued.

I purchased the “Max” battery for this kit which has a purported range of 20 miles.  On the first test ride I noticed that the battery charge level lights (5 total) and the display battery bar (4 lights total) did not seem to match up.  When climbing, after just 4 miles of riding, the lights on the battery went down to 3 of 5 and the lights on the display went down to 1 of 4.  When descending, the lights all returned to full power level.  This made me think that the charge level may be difficult to determine with any accuracy while cycling.

After 7 miles – battery charge level says 100%
After 15 miles – battery charge level says 25% (display) vs. 60% (battery)

To further test battery range as well as reliability during inclement weather, I took the bike out on a 15 mile round trip in a Portland late December rain storm.  My chosen route had several steep hills and their accompanying descents.  I started out in level 2, and increased the power to level 4 on climbs.  The display unit is meant to allow one to change the power levels on the fly by cycling through each level until you arrive at your chosen power input.  Unfortunately, with only one button controlling all operations on this display, I found that once I reached power level zero, I could not get the power to change while underway.  I had to stop, turn the display off, back on, and then select my power level.  I’m not sure yet if this is “operator error” or a malfunction in the unit.

While cycling the route, I noticed again a real disconnect between the battery level displayed on the battery and that shown on the display, plus the freaky zero power displayed on my climb back to my house.  Once I arrived home, I again found an extreme variance between the battery and the display, as noted in the photo above.  So, at this point I’m going to assume that it’s not possible to determine with much accuracy how much battery power is remaining.  With only 20 miles stated as the maximum for the largest battery offered, it might be wise to purchase several batteries so that you can install a spare if one wants to go on longer jaunts.  Battery maintenance instructions advise charging after every ride, and I think that is good advice given the lack of accuracy in the charge levels displayed.

So, how did this kit perform in inclement weather?  Well, just perfectly.  I found it wonderful to be out on a day I would not normally ride, and even though under power I still felt like I did something of a workout.  I had been concerned about how the magnetic disk would handle rain and road debris, but thanks to my mudflap everything stayed clean.  One thing I did notice is that I need to upgrade my brake pads for better performance in the rain.  The NOS Suntour pads are not up to par, and so I’ll probably install some KoolStop rain pads to insure more confidence for inclement weather.

I love how stealth the kit is – the bike barely looks altered from a distance and the motor is quiet.  I think the Swytch kit is a viable option for those not wanting to spend a small fortune on a quality e-bike, given its ease of installation (I spent $618).  I think converting an existing bike to an e-bike is an ideal way to go since you already have a bike that fits you, works well, and is beloved.  For older cyclists, I think conversion kits are a fantastic option to allow continued cycling without fear of fatigue or other health issues.

I’d love to see the Swytch Company “normalize” itself by stocking inventory for its kits and accessories and by making the ordering process equivalent to that of other online retailers.  It would be nice if the kit offered a lighting accessory, or at least a cable for it.  There is a way to hack the installation of a lighting kit, but probably most consumers will not be up for that.  The kit is probably ideally suited for 3 speed bikes, which are generally geared higher than touring or mountain bikes.  I’d also like to see the warranty/product registration process streamlined.  Currently, in order to secure your 1 year warranty, you must submit photos of your installation and receive approval from the company before the warranty is activated.  I submitted this documentation 5 days ago but have heard nothing back from company.

Overall, I’m happy with this conversion kit.  The upsides are the low cost, ease of installation and reasonable range with the Max battery.  The downsides are the lack of a longer range option, a torque sensor, lighting option, and a normal customer interface. The fiddly display is also a problem.  But, for my purposes – grocery hauling in my hilly neighborhood and general commuting – this kit is fine.  I love that I’m still riding a 37 year old bike and that with each grocery haul I’m not using my car.  That’s a real win.

A Raleigh Alyeska Touring Bike

During the mid-1980’s Raleigh came out with a whole touring line-up that ranged from the top-end 650b Portage to the entry level Wyoming model.  In between were the Kodiak and the Alyeska models which used 27inch wheels.  All of their touring frames were built with Reynolds double butted 555R tubing and forged dropouts, with the main differences among the models being the fork material, braze-ons and components.  All of these bikes were simply amazing in their build quality, and any one of them would be a great platform for many different kinds of riding.

When I purchased the bike 16 years ago from an eBay seller, it had gone through a restoration which involved having the frame powdercoated.  The job was well done, and the brick red color is evokes somewhat the hue of the original paint.  The lugs and lettering were highlighted with gold, a nice touch.

The Alyeska model featured so many nice touches:  a rear brake bridge, double eyelets front and rear, vertical rear dropout, 2 bottle cage mounts, a pump peg, rear rack and front low-rider braze-ons, and classy engraved Raleigh lettering on the seat stays, as well as the Raleigh logo engraved on the fork crown.

I believe this bike hails from 1986, given that the bottom bracket serial number begins with a 6.  The above scans are from a 1986 catalog I found at kurtkaminer.com.  You can also find a beautifully scanned 1984 catalog at Josh Capps’ site,The Simplicity of Vintage Cycles.

The original Sakae CR touring crankset was included with the bike when I purchased it.  However, I did swap out the middle 45T ring for a 39er, to make shifting a little easier, as not everyone is a fan of half-step gearing.  These chainrings are now 50/39/30.

I also made some other drive chain changes from the previous build to make the bike more user friendly:  a 14-28  7 speed indexing freewheel, Shimano indexing/friction bar end shifters and a bullet proof Shimano Acera rear derailleur.  The front derailleur is the original Shimano model and works well with the triple crank.  Gearing is now 29-96 gear inches.

The wheels are a new in 2007 set built by legendary Harris Cyclery (RIP) using SR M13II rims laced to Quando sealed bearing hubs.  I’ve never had to true the wheelset in all this time, and the Quando hubs are spinning perfectly as well.  The previous owner kept the original 27 inch wheel size for this upgrade, but the cantilevers will easily accept a 700c wheel.

And, the upgrade done by the previous owner included my favorite cantilevers:  Suntour XC Pro in classy Champagne finish.  There’s nothing to improve here!

I enhanced the elegance of this bike with a rando style bottle cage and some lovely MKS touring pedals.  I also added SKS fenders and removed the gigantic Surly touring racks included with the bike when I first purchased it.

Custom Meral and Raleigh Alyeska at the Pumpkin Patch on Sauvie Island.

We had loads of fun on the many rides we enjoyed over the last 16 years, but as of late the bike has not been ridden much.  It is time to pass it on to a new custodian.

I gave the bike a complete overhaul, and while most of the bike was in surprisingly great shape, I did find some nearly complete paint loss on the rear dropout.  A few small areas of paint loss also developed underneath the bottom bracket.  I have found similar issues on other powder coated frames I have worked on.  A bit of surface rust had developed on the exposed areas, so it was necessary to sand the compromised areas down, then apply primer and paint.  When I applied the first several coats of primer, I noticed that it was nearly the same color as the powder coat itself.  So, I called it good and added a few coats of clear coat on top.  The color difference is not really noticeable, as you can see from the previous photos.

It’s time to sell this lovely 37 year old.  It’s looking spry and should last for decades to come. The frame size is 21 inches which translates to a 53 cm seat tube.  Top tube length is 54 cm. I prefer to sell it locally ($900 firm) and not ship it, so if any Portland area readers are interested, please contact me:

 

 

 

 

Wear and Tear

Portland grown tomatoes

It was an extraordinarily gorgeous summer here in Portland.  We didn’t have super hot days, nor tons of wildfire smoke.  It was dry, as is true of the last several summers, but sans apocalyptic occurrences like pandemics, heat domes, and unbreathable air.  In short, this summer was a welcome relief from the past few even though we had very little rain.  While my flower and vegetable garden thrived,this also seemed to be the season of various equipment failures, including rims, tires, cassettes, an ebike motor, and my own muscles.

Deore hubs

Ritchey rims

What seemed to start it all off were the Ritchey rims that I had been using temporarily on my Terry.  These are 80’s rims that came off the Bridgestone and in a long convoluted story of wheel and tire swaps, they ended up on my Terry, replacing the wheelset I had originally built for the bike.

I never liked these un-eyeleted rims, but they were laced to a smooth as glass Deore hubset that really made the bike whiz around impressively.  So I tolerated the fact that I had to true them with some frequency, which is definitely not normal.  Finally I decided to take a closer look at the rims and discovered that some stress cracks were beginning to develop around the spoke holes.  That explained the truing problem, and made me worry that the rims were on the verge of failure.

This led to a lengthy process of trying to source either an appropriate 26 inch wheelset or a set of narrower 26 inch rims to replace the Ritcheys.  As part of this process I also noted that my tires (26X1.25 Pasela Tourguards) were looking pretty bald and worn.  And that involved another lengthy process of trying to source 26X1.25 tires, which are now nearly non-existent in the marketplace.  (Note: The Society of Three Speeds Blog recently posted about the difficulty in sourcing 26 x 1 3/8 tires and rims, which are used on many vintage 3 speed bikes.  This is a different size than used on my Terry, but also sad to note.)

I finally found some non-belted Paselas on eBay, and a set of CR18 rims from good ol’ Bell’s Bike Shop.  The regular Paselas ride a bit nicer than their belted counterparts, but offer less flat protection.  Also, they measure 28mm wide mounted to my rims as opposed to the 32mm wide Tourguards.  I was hoping they would plump out after use, but sadly – no go.  While waiting around for rims, I really wanted to keep riding the Terry so I stole the wheelset off the Bridgestone, and now the Terry is back to the wheelset I originally built.

All was well and good until I pulled a muscle during an over-vigorous and un-warmed-up climb and then had to stop riding altogether for awhile.  When I got the go ahead to cycle again, I needed to take it easy (impossible due to the hills around my house) and that meant using the dreaded…Brompton e-bike.

Ebike Schmeebike

Atop Mt. Tabor

So, am I being too harsh in my dislike of this bike?  I still own it and would happily sell it.  I think it was a mistake to to offer an e-bike version of the Brompton without making critical changes to address the harsh and bumpy ride (bigger tires, bigger wheels even?, front suspension?).  I would forgive all of this bike’s other disappointments if the ride quality could be improved.  Nonetheless, I rode around on this bike while recovering from my injury.  The one upside:  riding to the top of Mt. Tabor with energy to spare.

While my spine suffered abuse bouncing around on the Brompton, my muscles did heal, and finally I was back to riding my regular bikes.  During this time, an acquaintance let me know that he was selling his e-bike (not a Brompton but an Aventon) to upgrade to a new e-bike.  His bike looked about right for a family member that expressed interest in getting back into riding.  So, I bought his bike (which did not have a transferrable warranty) and planned to tune it up and pass it on to my family member.  Even though the bike worked fine on my test ride, it failed to operate as soon as I brought it back to my shop.  I then took it to the dealer, who though it was the controller cable gone bad that was causing the failure.  After waiting months for a replacement part, it turned out the that motor itself had failed, after only 11 months of use.  With no warranty, the cost to build the new motor into the wheel just didn’t make sense.  While I could have done it myself, at this point I didn’t want to throw good energy after bad money.  So, I gave the bike to the dealer.  So much for quality control.

Freehub too free?

1980s ALAN

During the rainless summer days, I was able to ride the ALAN with more frequency.  This bike was built as a cyclocross machine but I converted to commuting duty.  It’s got 24 inch wheels, and was built as a “Junior Racer” which may describe me as well.

11 tooth smalll cog

Wear on the splines

But yet another equipment failure occurred with the ALAN:  my gears began slipping in the higher gear/smaller cogs.  While this was happening my memory was prompted to think about the freehub:  it’s from the ’80s; and it’s weird.  I started to remember that either the freehub couldn’t take an 11 tooth small cog or that something else was odd about the freehub.

DESCRIPTION

Courtesy of Sheldon Brown

Upon getting it into the shop and removing the cassette (which was adequately torqued) I saw that it was one of those early threaded 8 speed freehubs which could accept both Uniglide and Hyperglide Shimano cassettes. I looked at the cassette and could see damage to the shoulders of the splined sections.  Then I took to the internet to read the Sheldon Brown articles about freehubs of this era.  Not only is this freehub threaded on the outside and the inside, it’s one of those non-11 tooth cog compatible hubs.  Basically, no matter how much you torque the lockring on the cassette, there will still be too much free play in the cassette if you use an 11 tooth small cog.  So, the solution is to NOT use an 11 tooth cog.  Once I figured this out, I ordered the correct 8 speed cassette and now (hopefully) I’ll never have this problem again.  Another more expensive option would be to replace the freehub, but I’ll save that for another day.

1980’s Custom Meral

On a positive note, I sold my Meral to a reader of this blog – wishing Mike many happy miles.  I’m looking forward to some splendid Fall cycling on my fun vintage machines.  And, while it can be tedious to keep our beloved bikes on the road, I think the payoff is always worth it.